John Locke Global Essay Prize 2026 Theology Prompts Breakdown

 
 

The John Locke Institute has just released the prompts for their international essay writing competitions for high school students. They have released three prompts for each of the following categories, philosophy, politics, economics, history, law, psychology, international relations, public policy, science & technology and theology. Each essay must address only one of the questions in your chosen subject category, and must not exceed 2000 words (not counting diagrams, tables of data, endnotes, bibliography or authorship declaration).

To be eligible to compete, one's 19th birthday must fall after 31 May, 2026. Given this easily satisfied requirement for high school students the world over, many compete in this competition, making it incredibly competitive.

The John Locke Competition is one of the most prestigious essay writing competitions for high school students. It ranks alongside the Scholastic Arts and Writing Awards as a humanities extracurricular activity that would impress admissions officers. Placing competitively in this competition could be what convinces an admissions officer at an elite university to admit an applicant.

One major difference between the John Locke competition and the Scholastic Writing and Arts Awards is that it has a right-wing, instead of a left-wing focus. Past winning essays have argued for fringe ideas like anarcho-capitalism. The John Locke Institute is committed to upholding the principles of classical liberalism espoused by John Locke, the founder of liberalism. Being liberal in Europe has a different connotation than it does in the U.S. While liberalism in the U.S. is associated with center-left politics like the Democratic Party, in Europe, it denotes what Americans would call libertarians, who believe in laissez-faire economic policies and upholding individual freedom to the point that it might enable individuals to infringe on the liberties of others, such as individuals having the right to deny service to people at their place of business due to their sexual orientation.

Despite the competition's right-wing focus, and the well-known left-wing bias of academics and admissions officers, high school students can place competitively without arguing for positions that would decrease their likability with a left-wing audience when applying to college.

We have extensive experience guiding applicants through this competition and are proud to have students who received at least a commendation from the judges. In this article, we will outline the three theology questions they ask and provide resources, along with cliff notes for these resources, to help start one's journey towards drafting compelling answers to these questions.

Theology Q1: Is religious experience better explained by neuroscience or by theology?

John Locke's Works

1. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689)

  • Book IV, Chapter XIX "Of Enthusiasm" examines claims to direct divine revelation

  • Locke argues enthusiasm bypasses reason and evidence

  • Proposes that genuine revelation must be tested by reason

  • Framework for evaluating religious experience claims

2. The Reasonableness of Christianity (1695)

  • Argues Christianity is fundamentally reasonable

  • Examines relationship between faith, reason, and revelation

  • Discusses how we can know religious claims are true

  • Locke's own integration of religion and empiricism

3. A Letter Concerning Toleration (1689)

  • Argues religious belief cannot be coerced

  • Discusses the inner nature of genuine faith

  • Relevant for understanding what religious experience involves

  • Framework for personal religious conviction

4. A Discourse of Miracles (1701)

  • Examines how we can know genuine divine action

  • Distinguishes true miracles from false claims

  • Relevant for evaluating religious experiences

  • Locke's epistemology of divine intervention

Historical Resources

1. William James's "The Varieties of Religious Experience" (1902)

  • Foundational psychological study of religious experience

  • Argues religious experience should be studied empirically

  • Identifies common features: ineffability, noetic quality, transiency, passivity

  • Classic that bridges scientific and theological approaches

2. Rudolf Otto's "The Idea of the Holy" (1917)

  • Introduces concept of "numinous" experience

  • Argues religious experience involves irreducible "mysterium tremendum et fascinans"

  • Claims religious experience cannot be fully reduced to other categories

  • Influential theological treatment

3. Thomas Aquinas's "Summa Theologica"

  • I, Q. 12 on how God is known

  • Discusses natural knowledge of God versus revealed knowledge

  • Distinguishes different modes of knowing God

  • Medieval framework for understanding religious knowledge

4. Friedrich Schleiermacher's "On Religion: Speeches to Its Cultured Despisers" (1799)

  • Defines religion as "feeling of absolute dependence"

  • Argues religious experience is sui generis, not reducible to ethics or metaphysics

  • Foundational for liberal Protestant theology

  • Framework for understanding religion as experience

5. Blaise Pascal's "Pensées" (1670)

  • "The heart has its reasons which reason knows not"

  • Distinguishes esprit de géométrie from esprit de finesse

  • Argues religious knowledge involves different faculty than scientific

  • Classic statement of limits of rational theology

6. David Hume's "The Natural History of Religion" (1757)

  • Early naturalistic explanation of religious belief

  • Argues religion originates in fear, ignorance, and psychological needs

  • Precursor to modern cognitive science of religion

  • Skeptical challenge to theological explanations

Contemporary Resources

1. Andrew Newberg's "Why God Won't Go Away" (2001) and neurotheology research

  • Brain imaging studies of meditation and prayer

  • Shows neural correlates of mystical experiences

  • Founder of "neurotheology" field

  • Scientific approach to religious experience

2. Michael Persinger's "temporal lobe hypothesis"

  • Claims religious experiences are temporal lobe phenomena

  • "God helmet" experiments attempting to induce religious experience

  • Controversial but influential neuroscientific approach

  • Represents strong reductionist position

3. Alvin Plantinga's "Warranted Christian Belief" (2000)

  • Argues religious belief can be "properly basic"

  • Develops Reformed epistemology

  • Claims religious experience can be genuine knowledge

  • Sophisticated philosophical defense of religious experience

4. Richard Swinburne's "The Existence of God" (1979, revised 2004)

  • Chapter 13 on religious experience as evidence for God

  • "Principle of credulity": Experiences are probably veridical unless defeaters exist

  • Argues religious experience provides genuine evidence

  • Philosophical defense of experiential theology

5. Matthew Alper's "The 'God' Part of the Brain" (2006)

  • Popular treatment of evolutionary/neuroscientific explanations

  • Argues religion is adaptive cognitive feature

  • Represents reductionist, debunking interpretation

  • Accessible neuroscientific skepticism

6. Justin Barrett's "Why Would Anyone Believe in God?" (2004)

  • Cognitive science of religion approach

  • Argues belief arises from ordinary cognitive mechanisms (HADD, ToM)

  • Does not claim this debunks religion

  • Nuanced cognitive scientific treatment

7. Ann Taves's "Religious Experience Reconsidered" (2009)

  • Argues for "building block" approach to religious experience

  • Bridges religious studies and cognitive science

  • Shows how experiences become "religious" through interpretation

  • Sophisticated interdisciplinary treatment

8. William Alston's "Perceiving God" (1991)

  • Argues mystical experience is genuine perception of God

  • Develops "mystical perception" epistemology

  • Claims religious experience is on par with sensory experience

  • Influential philosophical defense

Key Questions and Issues to Address

Definitional Challenges

  • What counts as "religious experience"? Mystical states, answered prayers, sense of presence?

  • What does "explained" mean? Caused, described, or explained away?

  • Are neuroscience and theology mutually exclusive or complementary explanations?

Theoretical Frameworks

  • Reductionism: Religious experience is "nothing but" brain activity

  • Non-reductive naturalism: Brain processes are necessary but not sufficient explanation

  • Theological realism: Experiences are genuine encounters with transcendent reality

  • Dual-aspect: Neuroscience and theology describe same phenomenon at different levels

  • How would Locke's empiricism approach this question?

Arguments for Neuroscience Explanation

  • Brain imaging shows neural correlates of religious experience

  • Drugs, brain stimulation, and pathology can induce similar experiences

  • Evolutionary and cognitive explanations show why religion is natural

  • Parsimony: No need to posit supernatural causes

Arguments for Theological Explanation

  • Neural correlates don't explain content or veridicality of experience

  • Mystical experiences across cultures report similar transcendent realities

  • Neuroscience explains the "how" but theology explains the "what" and "why"

  • Genuine perception requires brain activity; that doesn't make it illusory

The "Explains" Ambiguity

  • Does explaining the mechanism debunk the experience?

  • Compare: Neuroscience of vision doesn't show we don't really see

  • Genetic fallacy: Origin of belief doesn't determine its truth

  • But: If experience is fully explained without God, is God superfluous?

Evaluating Religious Experiences

  • How do we distinguish genuine from illusory religious experiences?

  • What role does interpretation play in constituting the experience?

  • Do cross-cultural similarities suggest common reality or common brain?

  • Can neuroscience and theology collaborate on this question?

Theology Q2: Research shows a strong inverse correlation between religiosity and per-capita spending on education. Does one cause the other?

John Locke's Works

1. Some Thoughts Concerning Education (1693)

  • Locke's comprehensive treatment of education

  • Discusses relationship between education and character/virtue

  • Relevant for examining how education affects religious belief

  • Framework for understanding education's purposes

2. The Reasonableness of Christianity (1695)

  • Argues Christianity is accessible to ordinary understanding

  • Suggests education not required for genuine faith

  • Relevant for examining whether education undermines religion

  • Locke's view on reason and faith

3. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689)

  • Book I argues against innate ideas, including religious ones

  • Suggests all knowledge comes from experience and education

  • Relevant for examining how education shapes belief

  • Empiricist framework for understanding belief formation

4. A Letter Concerning Toleration (1689)

  • Discusses role of persuasion versus coercion in belief

  • Argues beliefs are formed through understanding, not force

  • Relevant for examining how education affects religion

Historical Resources

1. Auguste Comte's "Course in Positive Philosophy" (1830-1842)

  • Proposes "law of three stages": theological, metaphysical, positive

  • Argues societies progress from religion to science

  • Foundational secularization thesis

  • Framework for education replacing religion

2. Max Weber's "The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism" (1905)

  • Examines relationship between religion and modernization

  • Argues Protestant rationalization contributed to secularization

  • "Disenchantment of the world" thesis

  • Framework for understanding religion-modernity relationship

3. Émile Durkheim's "The Elementary Forms of Religious Life" (1912)

  • Sociological analysis of religion's social functions

  • Argues religion serves social cohesion purposes

  • Relevant for examining what might replace religion's functions

  • Framework for understanding religion in society

4. Peter Berger's "The Sacred Canopy" (1967)

  • Develops secularization theory

  • Argues modernization undermines religious plausibility structures

  • Later revised his views in "The Desecularization of the World" (1999)

  • Influential and evolving sociological treatment

5. Historical data on literacy and religious change

  • Protestant Reformation and literacy campaigns

  • Enlightenment, education, and religious skepticism

  • 19th-century universal education and religious change

  • Historical context for the correlation

Contemporary Resources

1. Pippa Norris and Ronald Inglehart's "Sacred and Secular" (2004, 2011)

  • Uses World Values Survey data

  • Argues existential security, not education per se, drives secularization

  • Education correlates with security, which reduces religious need

  • Influential empirical treatment

2. Phil Zuckerman's research on secular societies

  • "Society Without God" (2008) on Scandinavian secularism

  • Examines how high-education, high-welfare societies become secular

  • Distinguishes correlation from causation

  • Sociological examination of secular societies

3. Research on education and religious belief

  • Studies showing educated individuals less religious on average

  • But also studies showing education increases religious sophistication

  • Distinction between affiliation, belief, and practice

  • Complex empirical picture

4. Rodney Stark's critiques of secularization theory

  • "The Triumph of Faith" (2015) argues religion is not declining globally

  • Challenges assumption that education causes secularization

  • Points to religious growth in educated societies (e.g., South Korea)

  • Counter-narrative to secularization thesis

5. Charles Taylor's "A Secular Age" (2007)

  • Comprehensive philosophical history of secularization

  • Argues secularity is not simply absence of religion but new "conditions of belief"

  • Complicates simple causal stories

  • Nuanced treatment of religion and modernity

6. Research on religious education

  • Effects of religious versus secular schooling

  • Studies on how education content affects belief

  • Distinction between education quantity and education type

  • Relevant for understanding mechanism

7. Studies on intelligence, education, and religion

  • Meta-analyses showing negative correlation between IQ and religiosity

  • Debates over interpretation and confounds

  • Raises questions about mechanism of education effect

  • Controversial but relevant research

8. Economic research on religion

  • Laurence Iannaccone's rational choice approach to religion

  • Research on opportunity costs of religious participation

  • Education increases opportunity cost of religious time

  • Economic framework for understanding correlation

Key Questions and Issues to Address

Definitional Challenges

  • How is "religiosity" measured? Belief, practice, affiliation, importance?

  • What counts as "education spending"? Quantity, quality, type?

  • What populations are we discussing? Countries, individuals, over time?

Correlation vs. Causation

  • What are possible causal relationships?

    1. Education spending causes reduced religiosity

    2. Reduced religiosity causes education spending

    3. Third variable causes both

    4. Complex reciprocal causation

  • What evidence would distinguish these?

Mechanisms: Education → Less Religion

  • Education promotes critical thinking that challenges religious belief

  • Education provides alternative explanations (science) for religious questions

  • Educated people have higher opportunity costs for religious participation

  • Education exposes people to diverse worldviews, relativizing their own

  • Universities are secular institutions that socialize away from religion

Mechanisms: Less Religion → Education Spending

  • Secular societies invest in this-worldly human capital development

  • Religious societies invest in religious education instead

  • Religion provides meaning and community that reduce need for education

  • Religious authority may resist secular education as threat

  • Correlation reflects different societal priorities

Third Variable Explanations

  • Wealth/development causes both education spending and secularization

  • Existential security (Norris/Inglehart) is the real driver

  • Urbanization causes both effects

  • Historical/cultural factors (Protestantism, Confucianism) shape both

  • Demographic transition affects both

Complications

  • The United States: High education spending, high religiosity

  • Religious growth in educated Asian societies

  • Distinction between different types of education

  • Global South patterns may differ from historical Western experience

Theoretical Frameworks

  • Secularization theory: Modernization (including education) erodes religion

  • Rational choice: Education changes incentive structures

  • Existential security: Education is proxy for security, which reduces religious need

  • How would Locke's empiricism explain belief formation through education?

Theology Q3: If you achieve enlightenment, how will you know?

John Locke's Works

1. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689)

  • Book IV, Chapter IX on knowledge of our own existence

  • Discusses how we know our own mental states

  • Chapter XIX on enthusiasm: How to distinguish genuine from false illumination

  • Framework for examining self-knowledge and verification

2. The Reasonableness of Christianity (1695)

  • Discusses marks of genuine faith versus false belief

  • Examines relationship between inner conviction and external confirmation

  • Relevant for examining how to verify spiritual states

  • Locke's epistemology of religious knowledge

3. A Discourse of Miracles (1701)

  • Discusses how to verify genuine divine action

  • Argues miracles must be tested against reason

  • Relevant for examining verification of spiritual attainment

  • Framework for distinguishing genuine from false claims

4. Some Thoughts Concerning Education (1693)

  • Discusses self-knowledge and moral development

  • Examines how we know we have achieved virtue

  • Relevant for parallel question of knowing moral progress

Historical Resources

1. The Buddha's discourses on enlightenment

  • Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta (First Sermon)

  • Descriptions of nirvana and its characteristics

  • Buddha's own account of his enlightenment

  • Primary source for Buddhist understanding

2. Patanjali's "Yoga Sutras" (c. 400 CE)

  • Defines stages of samadhi and liberation (kaivalya)

  • Describes characteristics of enlightened state

  • Provides systematic framework for spiritual progress

  • Hindu/yogic approach to the question

3. The Christian mystical tradition

  • Teresa of Ávila's "Interior Castle" (1577) on stages of prayer

  • John of the Cross's "Dark Night of the Soul"

  • Criteria for distinguishing genuine mystical union

  • Christian framework for spiritual verification

4. Zen Buddhist approach

  • Emphasis on sudden versus gradual enlightenment

  • Koan practice and transmission

  • "If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him"

  • Paradoxical approach to knowing enlightenment

5. Plato's "Allegory of the Cave" (Republic, Book VII)

  • Describes journey from darkness to light of truth

  • Philosopher who escapes knows by contrast with previous ignorance

  • But cannot fully explain to those still in cave

  • Classical Western treatment of knowledge and illumination

6. Meister Eckhart's sermons on detachment

  • Christian mystical treatment of spiritual attainment

  • Describes characteristics of soul united with God

  • Addresses how mystic knows the experience is genuine

  • Medieval Christian mysticism

Contemporary Resources

1. Robert Forman's research on "pure consciousness events"

  • "The Problem of Pure Consciousness" (1990)

  • Argues mystical experiences share common core across traditions

  • Examines what enlightenment experiences have in common

  • Phenomenological approach to mystical states

2. Daniel Goleman's "The Meditative Mind" (1988)

  • Maps stages of meditation across traditions

  • Examines how meditators know they've progressed

  • Psychological approach to spiritual development

  • Comparative treatment of contemplative traditions

3. Research on meditation and its effects

  • Studies on long-term meditators

  • Measurable changes in brain structure and function

  • Psychological measures of well-being and equanimity

  • Scientific approach to verifying spiritual attainment

4. Ken Wilber's "Integral Spirituality" (2006)

  • Attempts to map stages of spiritual development

  • Argues enlightenment involves developmental levels

  • Proposes criteria for assessing spiritual attainment

  • Influential integrative framework

5. Thomas Metzinger's "The Ego Tunnel" (2009)

  • Neuroscientific approach to self and consciousness

  • Examines what enlightenment might mean scientifically

  • Discusses "ego dissolution" experiences

  • Scientific perspective on self-transcendence

6. Sam Harris's "Waking Up" (2014)

  • Secular approach to meditation and spiritual experience

  • Argues enlightenment is possible without religious belief

  • Discusses how to recognize genuine spiritual progress

  • Secular spirituality perspective

7. Culadasa's "The Mind Illuminated" (2015)

  • Detailed practical guide to meditation stages

  • Describes markers of progress toward awakening

  • Combines Buddhist tradition with neuroscience

  • Contemporary meditation manual approach

8. Buddhist modernist literature

  • Jack Kornfield's "After the Ecstasy, the Laundry" (2000)

  • Examines what happens after enlightenment

  • Addresses how teachers verify students' attainment

  • Contemporary Buddhist perspective

Key Questions and Issues to Address

Definitional Challenges

  • What is "enlightenment"? Buddhist nirvana, Hindu moksha, Christian theosis, secular awakening?

  • Are these different traditions describing the same thing or different states?

  • Is enlightenment binary (achieved/not) or a matter of degree?

The Epistemological Problem

  • How can one know one has achieved a state one has never experienced?

  • Self-assessment is notoriously unreliable in other domains

  • Could one be enlightened and not know it? Know falsely that one is?

  • Is the question self-undermining (true enlightenment involves not caring about knowing)?

Possible Criteria for Knowing

  • Phenomenological: The experience has distinctive, unmistakable qualities

  • Behavioral: Lasting changes in conduct, equanimity, compassion

  • Cognitive: New understanding or perspective that cannot be lost

  • Relational: Recognition by enlightened teachers or community

  • Negative: Absence of suffering, craving, delusion

  • Pragmatic: The fruit of the path confirms the attainment

Tradition-Specific Approaches

  • Buddhism: Cessation of suffering, three characteristics directly known

  • Hinduism: Recognition of Atman-Brahman identity

  • Christianity: Indwelling of Holy Spirit, fruits of Spirit

  • Secular: Lasting well-being, ego dissolution, reduced reactivity

Problems with Each Criterion

  • Phenomenological: Experiences can be mimicked or misinterpreted

  • Behavioral: Changes could have other causes

  • Cognitive: Delusion could include false certainty

  • Relational: Teachers can be wrong or self-interested

  • Negative: Temporary relief is not enlightenment

  • Pragmatic: Placebo effects and confirmation bias

The Verification Paradox

  • If you need external verification, perhaps you haven't truly attained

  • If you claim certainty, you may be exhibiting spiritual ego

  • Many traditions emphasize humility about one's attainment

  • But complete uncertainty seems to undermine the concept

Theoretical Frameworks

  • Foundationalism: Enlightenment provides self-evident, incorrigible knowledge

  • Coherentism: Enlightenment coheres with teachings, practice, community

  • Pragmatism: Enlightenment is known by its fruits and effects

  • How would Locke's empiricism and skepticism about "enthusiasm" apply?

Contemporary Questions

  • Can neuroscience verify enlightenment?

  • Are "enlightened" teachers reliable judges of students' attainment?

  • What explains false claims to enlightenment (delusion, fraud, partial attainment)?

  • Is the question itself a trap that enlightenment transcends?

If you are overwhelmed by the number of sources and complexity of answering these questions, we understand. English teachers don't prepare high school students to tackle such formidable challenges in the humanities. But we do. Schedule a free consultation with a John Locke competition writing expert today and learn how to unpack all of these sources to write a coherent and logically sound 2000 word essay which will earn you a competitive placing in this competition and impress admission officers.

Work With Our John Locke Expert Coaches

If you are overwhelmed by the number of sources and complexity of answering these questions, we understand. English teachers don't prepare high school students to tackle such formidable challenges in the humanities. But we do.

Cosmic College Consulting has helped students earn shortlists, commendations, and prizes in the John Locke Competition. Our three expert coaches have collectively supervised 50+ John Locke essays and bring deep expertise in philosophy, politics, economics, and academic writing.

Marcus Lewis

John Locke Specialist | Scholastic Writing Expert

  • Supervised 25+ John Locke Competition essays with 10+ students earning commendations

  • Extensive Scholastic Arts & Writing Awards coaching, most students earn Gold or Silver Keys

  • Experience across fiction, satire, and argumentative essay forms

  • Coached students for Columbia Undergraduate Law Review Essay Competition (1 shortlist)

  • Additional experience with Profiles in Courage, Harvard Economics Essay, Bowseat, Engineer Girl, and Patricia Grodd Poetry competitions

Dr. Jason Goldfarb

PhD, Duke University | Published Academic & Periodical Writer

  • Supervised 25+ John Locke Competition essays, students have earned shortlists, Junior Prize placements, and top commendations

  • Supervised 10+ independent student research papers

  • Guided student publications in TeenInk, Scholastic, and IEEE Harvard

  • Published author in professional academic journals and popular periodicals

  • Brings doctoral-level expertise in constructing rigorous academic arguments

Ready to Write a Winning Essay?

Schedule a free consultation with one of our John Locke expert coaches today. Learn how to unpack these sources, develop a compelling thesis, and write a coherent, logically sound 2000-word essay that will earn you a competitive placing in this competition and impress admissions officers.

 
Previous
Previous

How Important Is The Activity List?

Next
Next

How Important Is GPA?